Contingent valuation is a widely used method for estimating the value of nonmarket commodities. Yet, a persistent issue is whether responses to Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) questions accurately reflect true values. Recent studies indicate that hypothetical bias is a significant factor that creates a gap between intentions and actions. I use a novel approach within non-market valuation – a List Experiment in the field – to test whether it can attenuate the hypothetical bias observed within CVM surveys. Using data from 400 subjects in a field experiment, I find initial promising results.

arrow-down-thickarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-right-thickarrow-rightcaret-downclosecodedeco-arrow-leftdeco-arrow-rightexternalfacebookfilterline-arrowlinkedinmagpaperpythonqarslider-arrow-leftslider-arrow-rightslidesxyoutubezip