In this study, I examine relative private signal strength and find
that offered advice is significantly more influential in changing
strategic mortgage default proclivity than is observed actions.
Moreover, these private signals are more reflective of financial
herding than they are of an information cascade. From a policy
perspective, herds are easier to reverse than are cascades making
more effective policies aimed at curbing the incidence of
strategic mortgage default. Interestingly, an informationally
equivalent change in private signal strength across actions and
advice alters strategic default willingness, but not the moral
stance of borrowers, which demonstrates the complexity of this
life-altering financially and emotionally impactful decision.